Courage, as they say, is doing what is right even when it is difficult. The question of what constitutes courage in athletics, however, appears to depend entirely on which direction the political winds are blowing.

A major newspaper recently published glowing coverage of Eileen Gu, an American-born freestyle skier who chose to compete for China rather than her native United States. The same publication, however, found fault with the U.S. men's Olympic hockey team for their decision to visit President Donald Trump at the White House following their gold medal victory.

The contrast in coverage raises serious questions about consistency in sports journalism and what values our nation's media outlets choose to celebrate.

The newspaper's sports section published a lengthy feature titled "Inside the mind of Eileen Gu, Winter Olympics superstar — and so much more." The piece described Gu as "the most decorated freestyle skier" and asked breathlessly, "So what is next for a young woman who seems to have it all?"

The analysis went further, suggesting readers "would be forgiven if you thought Gu was a quasi-human robot expertly created by artificial intelligence." Her media responses were characterized as "so eloquent."

Perhaps most tellingly, the piece claimed that when Gu skis, she "can fly without someone trying to clip her wings" and suggested this was "the only time she does not have to answer questions about U.S. President Donald Trump, Vice-President JD Vance."

This framing presents an athlete who turned her back on American opportunity to represent an authoritarian regime as somehow liberated from political pressure. The reality is considerably more complex.

Meanwhile, the same publication criticized the American hockey team for choosing to celebrate their achievement with their nation's president. The team, which brought home gold for the United States, apparently "lost the room" by accepting a White House invitation.

The double standard is difficult to ignore. An athlete who chose to represent China over America receives praise as transcendent and eloquent. American athletes who choose to honor their country's leader face criticism and questions about their judgment.

This represents more than just inconsistent sports coverage. It reflects a broader pattern in certain media circles where traditional American patriotism is viewed with suspicion while decisions that distance oneself from American identity receive celebration.

The men's hockey team earned their gold medal through dedication, teamwork, and representing their country with distinction on the world stage. Their choice to visit the White House, regardless of which president occupies it, represents a time-honored tradition of celebrating American athletic achievement.

Gu certainly possesses remarkable athletic ability. Her accomplishments on skis are undeniable. But the decision to compete for China rather than the United States deserves scrutiny, not uncritical adulation, particularly from American media outlets.

The question is not whether athletes should face political pressure. Rather, it is whether our media can apply consistent standards when evaluating the choices athletes make about national identity and patriotic expression.

Americans deserve journalism that celebrates those who choose to represent their country, not coverage that elevates those who turn away from it while criticizing those who embrace it.

Related: Senate and House Democrats Bring Illegal Aliens as Honored Guests to Trump Speech